This detour is all the more striking because no direct experience justifies it. Neither of these authors has observed the practice he is dealing with. They never went to see for themselves, any more than Marx ever went to a factory. Why then do they constitute these practices as a hermetic enigma in which they can read in inverted form the key of their theories?
Michel de Certeau, The practice of everyday life, p. 64
-
bobreijnen
Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.