Updates from October, 2010 Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Avatar of Lourens ter Veen

    Lourens ter Veen 1:51 am on October 24, 2010 Permalink | Log in to leave a Comment
    Tags:   

    For Freud as for Kant, it is a matter of an autonomous faculty that can be defined but not learned: “The lack of judgement,” Kant says, “is properly what one calls stupidity, and for his vice there is no remedy.” The scientist is no more spared this vice than anyone else.

    Certeau, 73
     
  • Avatar of nadja

    nadja 12:34 am on October 24, 2010 Permalink | Log in to leave a Comment
    Tags:   

    Art is thus a kind of knowledge that operates outside the enlightend discourse which it lacks.

    Certeau 66
     
  • Avatar of harir

    harir 12:31 am on October 24, 2010 Permalink | Log in to leave a Comment
    Tags: ,   

    “Kant discerns in what he calls,in a stroke of genius, a “logical tact” (Logische Takt).Inscribed in the orbit of an esthetics,the art of operating is placed under the sign of the faculty of judgement, the “alogical” condition of thought.The traditional antinomy between “operativity” and “reflection” is trancended through a point of view which aknowledging art as the root of thought, makes judgement a “middle term” (Mittelglied) between theory and praxis.”

    Certeau,de M.(72).
     
  • Avatar of thomashvv

    thomashvv 12:29 am on October 24, 2010 Permalink | Log in to leave a Comment
    Tags:   

    What is miraculous about the past is that we have succeeded–God knows how–in making thousands and millions of individual human beings, lock well enought into one another to give us what looks like a common past, a shared story.

    Elizabeth Costello
     
  • Avatar of brittdebruyn

    brittdebruyn 12:28 am on October 24, 2010 Permalink | Log in to leave a Comment
    Tags:   

    The distinction no longer refers essentially to the traditional binominal sets of ‘theory’ and ‘practice’, specified by a further distinction between ‘speculation’ aimed at deciphering the book of the cosmos and concrete ‘applications’; rather the distinction concerns two different operations, the one discursive (in and through language) and the other without discourse.

    Certeau, blz 65
     
  • Avatar of brittdebruyn

    brittdebruyn 12:26 am on October 24, 2010 Permalink | Log in to leave a Comment
    Tags:   

    The distinction no longer refers essentially to the traditional binominal sets of ‘theory’ and ‘practice’, specified by a further distinction between ‘speculation’ aimed at deciphering the book of the cosmos and concrete ‘applications’; rather the distinction concerns two different operations, the one discursive (in and through language) and the other without discourse.

    Citation
     
  • Avatar of daya

    daya 12:05 am on October 24, 2010 Permalink | Log in to leave a Comment  

    “There used to be a time when we knew. We used to believe that when the text said, ‘On the table stood a glass of water,’ there was indeed a table, and a glass of water on it, and we had only to look in the word-mirror of the text to see them. But all that has ended. The word-mirror is broken, irreparably, it seems.”

    (Coetzee 19)
     
  • Avatar of rebeccadrees

    rebeccadrees 11:35 pm on October 23, 2010 Permalink | Log in to leave a Comment  

    Concerning them it occurs to no one to ask whether there is knowledge; it is assumed there must be, but that it is known only by people other than its bearers. Like that of poets and painters, the know-how of daily practices is supposed to be known only by the interpreter who illuminates it in his discursive mirror though he does not possess it either.

    Certeau – The Arts of Theory p.71
     
  • Avatar of Jeroen

    Jeroen 11:33 pm on October 23, 2010 Permalink | Log in to leave a Comment
    Tags:   

    More generally, for Durkheim, society is a kind of writing that only he can read. Here, knowledge is already written in places, but not yet enlightened. Science will be the mirror that makes it readable, the discourse “reflecting” an immediate and precise operativity lacking language and consciousness, an operativity already knowledgeable but unrefined.

    De Certeau, the Arts of Theory, p. 68
     
  • Avatar of geerte

    geerte 11:33 pm on October 23, 2010 Permalink | Log in to leave a Comment
    Tags: knowledge,   

    Concerning them it occurs to no one to ask whether there is knowledge; it is assumed that there must be, but that it is known only by people other than its bearers.

    The practice of everyday life – Michel de Certeau
     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
esc
cancel